|
Of the 199 inhabited islands considered in the
assessment, 4 had all their buildings destroyed, 9 lost three quarters of
their structures, 7 lost half, 31 lost a third, and 82 had no structural
damage (no data was available from 66 islands). A total of 3,997 buildings
were damaged in the Maldives and will need to either be
reconstructed or repaired. The extent of this damage is currently being
assessed to determine the levels and approaches for response in regard to
housing.
The majority of islands were flooded to varying degrees
immediately after the disaster. Available data showed that 69 islands were
completely flooded, 17 were half flooded, and 27 and 24 suffered one third
and minimal flooding respectively (no data was available on flooding from 62
islands).
The table below indicates the number of islands and the
extent in which they were flooded or suffered structural damage (source data:
post-disaster assessment; National Disaster Management Centre, Male’).
|
Cross tabulation of number of
islands affected
|
Level of structural damage
|
|
All
|
3/4
|
1/2
|
1/3
|
None
|
No data
|
Total
|
|
Level of flooding
|
All
|
4
|
7
|
5
|
22
|
11
|
20
|
69
|
|
Half
|
|
|
|
3
|
8
|
6
|
17
|
|
1/3
|
|
|
1
|
3
|
15
|
8
|
27
|
|
Minimal
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
6
|
24
|
|
No data
|
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
30
|
26
|
62
|
|
Total
|
4
|
9
|
7
|
31
|
82
|
66
|
199
|
Using the above information, and looking at areas where
displacement has occurred, islands were categorized into 4 areas in which the
highest number of affected people were likely to be found, or who would
require monitoring. These categories are defined as follows:
Category
1 islands:
Islands in which more than half of the
population has been displaced, where there has been complete flooding, and in
which large structural damage has occurred. In these islands, the entire population
would require some level of support, irrespective of their economic
profiles. A total of 13 islands
fall into this category.
Category
2 islands:
Islands that have been completely or half
flooded, even if no structural damage has occurred. This is based on the
assumption that even if there was no damage to buildings, flooding is likely
to have destroyed or damaged agricultural lands, seeds, tools and
fertilizers, or equipment related to specialized income activities such as
power-tools for carpenters. Conversely, islands that have had lower levels of
flooding yet have suffered structural damages also implies the loss of
assets, and so are placed into this category. Within this group, only people
with certain economic profiles would require some level of support. A total
of 82 islands fall into this category.
Category
3 islands:
All islands that have been flooded between a
third and a half, even if no structural damage has occurred. This is based on
the same assumptions referred to in the second category above. A total of 23
islands fall into this category.
Category
4 islands –monitoring essential:
Islands that have had minimal flooding will
require monitoring to see whether agricultural production has been affected.
This will be the same for all islands that have no flooding data. A total of 81
islands fall into this category.

During the VPA 2004, island chiefs were asked to state
the most important economic activities in which people from the island are
involved in or rely on, and to rank these activities in order of importance.
The data shows that of the 200 islands assessed in the VPA, the primary
economic activity for people on 99 islands (50% of total islands) was
fishing, 40 islands (20%) was tourism, 20 islands (10%) was agriculture, 16
islands (8%) was Government or public works employment, and the remaining
islands’ primary livelihood opportunities were based on manufacturing, trade,
or were not stated. The second most important economic livelihood activities
in the islands were Government/public works employment and fishing - 53 and
50 (27% and 25%) islands respectively, 31 (16%) islands for both construction
and tourism, trade on 24 (12%) islands, and the remainder either in
manufacturing or were not stated.

Excluding the capital of Male’, 49% of the population in
the islands (92,500 people) live in areas where the main economic activity is
fishing. This is followed by islands where tourism is the most important
activity (18% - 34,300 people) and Government / public works (10% - 18,400
people).
When looking at the secondary economic activities, it
was found that 51,200 people (27%) lived on islands where this was related to
Government / public works, 36,200 people (19%) in islands related to trade,
33,000 people (18%) in tourism, and 28,100 people (15%) in both fishing and
construction.
Given that those people involved in Government and
public works activities have regular employment and salaries paid by the
Government, it was felt that the chance of people losing these jobs or
salaries due to the tsunami as unlikely. As regards the tourism industry, it
was also felt that those directly involved in working in resorts would only
be temporarily affected if the resort itself was damaged, and for the time it
takes to rebuild it. For the most part, many of the people on those islands
linked to tourism are primarily involved in the provision of supplies
(fruits, vegetables, fish and seafood’s, etc.), handicrafts, and other
services. As such, the livelihoods of these people have been captured as part
of other economic categories in this study.
Taking the above into consideration, the assessment
concentrated on those livelihoods linked to fishing, agriculture,
manufacturing and construction, and trade to get a better understanding of
the impact that the tsunami may have had on peoples ability to generate their
income.

This group is likely to comprise of female and / or
disabled bodied head of households, or those that simply cannot find work.
Community members also identified large families where almost all children
were in school and the household head being unable to work as falling into
this category. This group has been subdivided into two categories, namely
those that are receiving remittances from family members off the island, and
those that are not.
For the former, although they are not working they are
receiving support and assistance through remittances by family members that
could be living abroad, working in the tourist industry, or in Male’. As
such, they have an income source and a family that looks after their welfare
– some families reported that they expect a steady flow of remittances to
begin at the end of January. For the latter group, these people have no
regular sources of income, or family members working off the islands that can
send back remittances. They are generally reliant on kinship and / or
community for in-kind assistance of food, and for their basic non-food
essentials such as the payment of medical, fuel, and electricity bills. As
such, the unemployed with no remittances are likely to be social welfare
cases, and should be regarded as the extreme vulnerable.
The tsunami has placed strain on the communities as a
whole. Although community networks are still supporting this group, resources
to share with the unemployed with no external family support are currently
limited.

Households whose income is primarily reliant on
agricultural activities fall into this category. Two
types of agricultural activities were identified for people involved in this
activity on the islands visited, namely larger scale farming on communal
land, and small scale home gardens. Both are used to generate income for the
household, though the latter is used more for family consumption. The main
crops grown are vegetables and fruits. Where communal land was present, all
families could access it. Larger families who would thus have more members to
work the land, tended to have larger agricultural plots. Although some hiring
of people to work the land by those with larger plots did occur, it was
reported to be a rather limited and uncommon practice.
An estimated one third of the
crop production is kept for household consumption and for sharing amongst the
islanders or to other relatives and friends outside of the island. Depending on the scale of
agriculture done by the household for sale, produce is either sold within the
island, or to traders who resell this in Male’, the resorts, or in a few
cases to other islands nearby. On the islands visited where
agriculture was a key livelihood activity, it was reported that produce
contributed to an estimated 60% of the household income.
The tsunami has washed away agricultural crops,
seeds, tools, and fertilizers. People are reporting that the soil and water
for irrigation is still too salty to begin replanting, even if they had the
seeds and tools. People felt that if heavy rains could flush the salt content
out of the land and underground water, it would take approximately six months
to get vegetable production back on track, and about two years to get
agriculture back to pre-tsunami levels. People have requested a technical
evaluation of the soil and water as they are unsure when they can resume
their agricultural activities.
Islanders have also expressed an interest in
hydroponics agriculture, but do not know whether this is technically feasible
or how it would be financed. The possibility of establishing communal plots
was proposed by one island chief, but people were unsure as to how water
would be managed, and stated a preference for having independent plots. Home
nurseries to germinate seedlings during the time it takes for agricultural
land to become desalinated was discussed as a possibility for intervention,
though it was felt by the communities that this may be constrained by the
lack of sweet water for irrigation.
Many people also felt that until they can get
their agricultural activities back on track and some income is being
generated, they will be unable to get loans as they have no collateral, or be
unable to repay the monthly contributions and interest. Fishing, as an
interim income generating activity is only possible for a few families. Many
of them have reported that they have either lost their fishing skills, or do
not know how to fish as they have not used this as part of their livelihood
strategies in the past. In any case, these families do not have fishing
equipment.

These people are involved in income generating
activities that range from small cottage industries, such as weaving, rope
making, tailoring, seamstresses, and preserving of fruits and vegetables to
more highly skilled activities such as carpenters, electricians, and welders.
In all cases, with the exception of activities like weaving and rope making
that uses natural resources, expensive specialized equipment is used such as
sewing machines and power-tools. Small cottage industries are mostly used as
primary income for women, and it was reported that weaving and rope making
can contribute up to 15% of the household economy. Specialized activities
such as carpentry and welding are, in most cases, the sole source of income
for families involved in these businesses. They have made large investments
in the purchasing of equipment, workers are highly skilled, and have little
other livelihood diversification strategies to fall back on, such as fishing
or agriculture.
In areas flooded by the tsunami, most of these tools and
equipment have either been damaged by salt water, or lost. Islands have
reported high losses of sewing machines, high powered electrical
tools, electrical appliances and generators. Although weaving and rope making
has already begun on some islands, women have been stating that there is
still no market for these products.
In all islands visited, focus groups consistently
identified these people as one of the most highly affected and vulnerable
groups from the tsunami, as they have lost their tools and due to their specialized
income generating activities, they have few options or skills to engage in
other activities. In one island, a discussion with this group revealed that
they were too scared to go out on the boats to fish as they did not how to do
so, even though there were boats available if they needed them.

Most fishing revolves around
deep water line fishing for tuna, where catches are primarily sold to
offshore ‘collective boats’ or to fish processors back on the islands. It was
reported that approximately two thirds of the catch will be purchased by
these collective vessels, and the remainder (normally comprised of damaged or
non-tuna fish species) by the fish processors (tuna only). Prior to deep
water fishing, fishermen go out on the reefs at night and use generator
operated spotlights and nets to catch bait fish. Fish processing involves the
cleaning, boiling, smoking and sun-drying of tuna, which is then sold to the
markets of Male’ for further export. Families can either be exclusively
involved in one or the other of these two activities, or rely on both.
Extended families may also have members either fishing or processing.
Although it was reported that some islands have communal fish processing
units, this is uncommon and most people have their own facilities at home.
Some fishermen supplement their income with lobster or reef fishing for the
resorts.
The tsunami has affected
these activities in various ways and degrees across the islands. Some islands
have reported losses or damages to boats, or fishing nets, spotlights and
generators used for fishing. Others have reported that only fish processing
units – consisting of a concrete slab for cleaning fish, large pots for
boiling, and smoking sheds and drying racks - have been lost. In all cases
with the exception of those islands that have been completely devastated, it
was reported that most fishermen have resumed fishing, and people can fish
communally if needed. Those that are not fishing have either lost equipment,
or are engaged in cleaning debris and / or reconstruction. Catches are either
being sold to the collective boats, or are brought back to the island and
shared with the community as food. Approximately a quarter to a half of those
involved in fish processing have resumed their activities – for those that
have not, this is because they have either lost their equipment or are
involved in clearing debris from their homes. Given that these activities are inter-related,
fishermen relying on fish processors to purchase surplus catches will have
lost income if the latter have lost their equipment and are unable to process
fish. Conversely, fish processors relying on fishermen to bring back catches
to the island will suffer where fishing has reduced.

Families involved in construction would be builders,
brick makers, or engaged in more industrial types of activities such as
building contractors and businesses, finishers, or operators of construction
or demolition equipment. The latter are more linked to larger industrial
islands, whereas the former are more likely to be found in the smaller
islands linked to other livelihood activities.
It
was reported that these people bring to the island only the quantities of
building materials (e.g. cement) required for a specific job, as storage on
the islands is limited. Thus, stocks that have been lost will not, for the
most part, be excessive. Of greater concern would be the loss of brick making
moulds – yet these are fairly inexpensive, estimated at around 500 Ruffia
(approximately US$40) each. However, given that the skills
of this group are now in high demand in the reconstruction effort, people
reported that the greatest needs will be the materials for rebuilding homes,
which would in turn provide employment for this group. These materials are
already starting to reach the islands, and the greatest need for this group
would be to have access to credit and loans to replace any moulds or basic
tools (trowels, wheel barrows, buckets, and spades) that would allow for the
making of bricks and building of homes. It was also reported that there are
many people on the islands who know how (and indeed like) to make bricks and
do basic construction that would assist the full time construction workers.

Trade
mainly operates directly between the island and Male’, and less so between
islands and the atoll centres - although there is small scale trade between
islands, mostly to the resorts where goods (vegetables and fruits, fish,
handicrafts, etc.) are sold. Most traders have their own shops, and
many have secondary income generating activities or lease and hire their
boats to others.
Traders go to Male’ with commodities produced or
collected on the islands (such as dried fish, vegetables, shells, woven mats,
etc.) for sale. Whilst there, they purchase goods needed back on the islands,
including basic food commodities - rice, flour and sugar – from the
Government run State Trading Organization (STO) at subsidized rates. The
Government sets a ceiling on the profit that a trader can resell this food.
This ensures that staple food prices are regulated, and profits made on food
are used to pay for porter and transportation (fuel, boat hiring) costs
rather than as a source of income. The bringing of food to the island is done
more so as a service to the community rather than as a way to make money, and
profits are made through the sale of other more expensive goods and non-food
essentials. It was found in most islands visited that traders know how to
manage their food stocks, and how often and in what quantities food has to be
brought back to the island. Other opportunities for purchasing goods outside of the island yet
not through the traders exist in the use of ferries. This is done by
individuals, and mostly when they take their children to schools outside of
the island or when they need to go to Male’ or atoll centres for health or
business reasons.
Transport and trade in the tsunami affected islands has
reduced, as people have little or no purchasing power and few to no
commodities to trade or sell. The Women’s Development Committee (WDC) that
manage the food stocks on one island reported – ‘There is no produce on the
island that we can purchase and sell in Male’, and cover the expenses
required to hire a boat. So we can not bring food supplies back to the
island.’ Their solution was to try and get a cash loan to hire a boat from a
local islander that needs money, and restart their trade again whilst
prompting cash flows through the island. Already half of the families have at
least one family member that has started fishing and is getting some income
whilst others are processing dried fish, and the women felt that this would
be sufficient to get their trade up and running once the commodities of the
first boat trip have been sold and they can begin to hire boats again.
Many traders and shopkeepers have reported the
loss or damage of stocks, and that business has almost halved. Others have
not re-opened their shops as people don’t have money to spend – much cash and
savings were washed away during the tsunami. Although cash flows through remittances
are beginning and are expected to increase by the end of January, this is
still insufficient to get trade fully back on track. Other traders have
decided that at the moment they cannot resume any large-scale trading given
the limited purchasing power of people. Another problem facing traders is the
purchase of fuel – not only is there a current shortage, but with reduced
business they are unable to cover transportation costs. This will not only
impact the flow of food into the islands, but also all the essential non-food
items and commodities that people require. As such, it is critical that cash
is injected into the economy, and that relief interventions aim to promote
the purchasing power of people, and support rather than disrupt or undermine
trade flows and transportation.

Those people that are reliant on tourism normally do not
live on the islands but rather on the tourist resorts, or will commute daily
to their place of work. They also send remittances back to their families on
the islands.
Provided that the resorts in which they work are still
operational, they will have a secure income. However, in areas where resorts
may be temporarily closing down for reconstruction or are laying people off,
these groups will lose their income source. People that are working in
resorts that have not been damaged, yet are facing a reduction of tourists,
may be at risk to temporary lay-offs. Thus, it is essential that tourism
returns to pre-tsunami levels to ensure employment for the people working in
the resorts and a continued flow of remittances back to the islands to
support and assist families. As this is currently the high season for
tourism, it would be vital that this activity picks up as soon as possible.
 4.2h: Government / public works
These people are involved in some form of
Government, industrial, or public works and services activities. They are
still employed, and will continue to receive salaries. However, factories
that have lost machinery and equipment will be running at a loss, and until
this is addressed there is always the risk of temporary lay-offs.

These families comprise of small artisans, artists,
musicians etc. It was not possible to identify these groups during the
assessment, and determine how the tsunami has impacted their livelihoods.
 4.3: Internally Displaced People (IDP’s)
Large displacements have occurred in 13 islands, with
people being displaced within their own islands, or having moved to others.
Although at first glance some of these numbers may not seem to be high (e.g.
90 people in Madifushi island), they do represent almost the entire
community, implying that reliance on each other for assistance for the months
of reconstruction ahead wont be possible. Overall, almost 11,000 people have
been displaced in large numbers and in islands that have had almost total
flooding or infrastructural damage to homes and buildings. The table on the
following page indicates the number of recorded displaced as of the beginning
of January, from data sourced from the National Disaster Management Centre.
Although some tracking of IDP’s to other islands has been done, this group
has been on the move, with some families returning to their place of origin whilst
others moving elsewhere.
|
Atoll
|
Island
|
Total
population
|
Displaced
in island
|
Displaced
out of island
|
Total
displaced
|
Total
affected population by displacement
|
|
Dhaalu
|
Gemendhoo
|
322
|
0
|
322
|
322
|
322
|
|
Dhaalu
|
Vaanee
|
346
|
0
|
280
|
280
|
346
|
|
Gaafu Alifu
|
Viligili
|
2261
|
1686
|
250
|
1936
|
2261
|
|
Haa Alifu
|
Filladhoo
|
659
|
393
|
141
|
534
|
659
|
|
Kaafu
|
Guraidhoo
|
1225
|
672
|
553
|
1225
|
1225
|
|
Laamu
|
Mundhoo
|
517
|
0
|
504
|
504
|
517
|
|
Laamu
|
Dhabidhoo
|
601
|
464
|
0
|
464
|
601
|
|
Laamu
|
Kalhaidhoo
|
433
|
72
|
361
|
433
|
433
|
|
Meemu
|
Muli
|
787
|
650
|
0
|
650
|
787
|
|
Meemu
|
Kolhufushi
|
936
|
500
|
0
|
500
|
936
|
|
Meemu
|
Madifushi
|
122
|
0
|
90
|
90
|
122
|
|
Raa
|
Kadholhudhoo
|
2717
|
100
|
2617
|
2717
|
2717
|
|
Thaa
|
Vilufushi
|
1155
|
0
|
1155
|
1155
|
1155
|
|
|
Total
|
12,081
|
4,537
|
6,273
|
10,810
|
12,081
|
These IDP’s are identified as being amongst the most
vulnerable population group, and are completely dependant on host communities
and the Government. Their asset bases have been lost, and they are unable to
restart their livelihoods until they return home and rebuild their houses, or
settle down in a new location.
Approximately 50% of their homes were completely
destroyed, and a further estimated 30% badly damaged across these islands. In
three of the islands visited in the assessment, almost all homes have been
totally destroyed. Overcrowding in homes that were not damaged or with the
host communities is exacerbating already poor sanitation facilities, and
further strain is being placed on limited water resources in host islands.
The Government, in collaboration with aid agencies, has started erecting
sanitary facilities and temporary shelters to cater for displaced populations
and to begin easing the pressure on host communities or families.
Nonetheless, overcrowding is still a serious problem, as tents provided are
insufficient to house all the affected families and two to three households
can be found sharing the same tent (in Kolhufushi island, 48 tents were
provided for approximately 200 households). Such conditions, if not addressed
immediately, are likely to result in the outbreak of diseases. Currently,
efforts are underway to ensure that adequate and sufficient shelters are
provided to the IDP’s.
The majority of the IDP’s relied on fishing as their
main livelihood activity. In several islands, people were tuna fishing for
income, whilst in others fishing was primarily for subsistence. No major
damages to fishing boats were reported, and the majority of fishermen still
had their boats. An estimated 50% of fishermen have begun fishing, though
this is mostly to provide fish to their communities at no cost, and reflecting
the strong social networks that exist within these communities. Those who
have not gone back to fishing stated that they were waiting for the cleaning
of the islands to be completed, for the reconstruction effort to begin, or
because they simply do not want to leave their families behind whilst they
are unsettled and living in the open or in a host community. Some fishermen
have reported the loss of equipment, and do not have utensils to prepare
fish.
The peak fishing period was identified to run between
January and April, and interventions should be timely to enable fishermen who
have not resumed these activities as yet to take advantage of the peak
seasons. Those who were relying on agriculture have lost their crops and
fruit trees, and land and water has been contaminated with salt.
The Government and other donors have been providing food
- rice, flour and sugar, and other food items such as noodles, milk, juices
and water – as well as non-food essentials to the IDP’s. Consumption patterns
have reportedly remained the same - three meals a day. Distribution systems
were found to be efficient, and the food rations distributed to beneficiaries
last approximately 2 weeks before another cycle is required.
The
immediate priorities identified by IDP’s were:
Reconstruction and repair of damaged houses
Provision of water and sanitation facilities
Provision and restoration of health facilities
Provision of cash to restore assets and other
household goods
Continued provision of food that would free
any cash resources they may have left, or that they would be able to earn

One of the greatest worries expressed by the islanders
is their ability to get loans. Many people were repaying loans from the
National Bank or the Atoll Development Committee that had been taken to
purchase household goods or income generating equipment. Due to the tsunami,
these assets may have been lost or damaged, yet the repayments on the loans
are still outstanding. People doubt their ability to pay off two loans were
they to take another to replace lost goods or rebuild houses. Another concern
raised is that they no longer have assets that they can mortgage (such as a
house), can not put up an equal amount of cash in order to get a loan, or
have any form of collateral as surety against a loan.

In the islands visited, it
was reported that prior to the tsunami, people were eating three meals a day
consisting of rice, fish and vegetables, and with morning and afternoon
snacks. Typical meals consist of chapatti and tuna for breakfast, and various
curries, rice and salads for both lunch and dinner. Curry is often watery and
contains very little protein. A typical Maldivian dish – Gardhia -
consists of clear fish soup with chilli and some tuna, and is eaten daily
either at lunch or dinner. Some green leaves are consumed in salads, but in
limited amounts. In general, children normally eat the same types of food and
have the same meal frequency as the rest of the family, though their portion
size is smaller. Men and young boys are served first, then women and younger
children. It is most often the male household member who gets most food in
terms of quality and quantity. Infants were fed a combination of breast milk
and baby foods – typically commercial porridges.
Although it appears that
people may have sufficient food to eat in terms of meeting energy
requirements, dietary diversity is poor due to low availability of fruits and
vegetables on the islands. A second MICS survey conducted by the Ministry of
Health, UNICEF, and WHO in 2001 raised concerns on the nutritional status of
children in the Maldives.
Although malnutrition rates have decreased since the MICS 1 study conducted
in 1995, the malnutrition
rates among children under five still remains high, with 24.8% stunting
(chronic malnutrition), 13.2% wasting (acute malnutrition), and 30.4%
underweight (overall malnutrition) reported.
There are little data available on micronutrient
deficiencies in the Maldives. An iodine deficiency disorder
survey conducted by the Ministry of Health and WHO in 2002 found moderate
goitre prevalence of 25.7%, and 0.1% of severe goitre among children 6-12
years. Salt with inadequate iodine content was consumed by 38% of the children.
Due to limited intake of vegetables and other sources of iron it is likely
that rates of anaemia is high among children and women. Thalesima (a genetic
anaemia) is a known problem amongst Maldivian's but this is not related to
dietary intake.
Since the tsunami, it was
reported that adults and children are still eating three meals a day, though
they have stopped eating snacks. Vegetables have either greatly reduced or
been removed from the diet as this food source has been lost – this is a
cause for concern as it further deteriorates what could have already been a
poor diet. The loss of agricultural production has reduced the availability
of fresh fruits and vegetables, and is a situation that could last for an
extended period of time until agriculture resumes. In addition, households
that used to have poultry have lost these in the tsunami, and with them
protein sources of meat and eggs. For weaning infants, it was also reported
that there has been no change in the feeding practices both before and after
the tsunami, though the solids fed to babies have changed. They received jars
of baby food in their relief packages, though it is not clear what the source
of this was - whether it came through a Government distribution or from
another in-kind donation given directly to the island. In any case, this is
not a sustainable practice.
 4.4c: Women’s Development Committee’s
Most islands have a Women’s Development Committee
(WDC). In some islands, these committee’s were found to be extremely active,
running small businesses, generating income for community projects, and
managing the island food stocks. Where possible, implementation of food based
interventions should be channelled through these WDC’s, and have them take an
active role in targeting, managing and monitoring food distributions – where
required - as a primary implementing partner.

|